User:Priyaraymond/Functional neurologic disorder/Mdbutler7 Peer Review

General info
Priyaraymond
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Priyaraymond/Functional neurologic disorder - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Functional neurologic disorder - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
Many of your edits in the lead enhance the article and make the statements a little clearer. However, some of the edits seem to be unnecessary, and may not be the most suitable word choices in comparison to the original article statements. I do not think the edits including "prevalent", "diverse", "movement", and "similar" are necessary. Your rewordings of complete sentences later in the lead definitely felt like an enhancement though. Grammatically, I think it would make more sense to alleviate the word "therefore" instead of "It is" in the second to last sentence. Also, in that same sentence, it appears you've repeated a phrase twice, making the statement hard to understand and leading to some grammatical errors. Aside from that, I don't have many critiques or areas of the article to improve that weren't already listed in the articles Talk page. If you haven't already, check out the Talk page; many users have already pointed out areas of interest to improve upon.

~