User:Profhanley/teaching/literature of labor

The goal of this assignment is for several groups of students to choose an underdeveloped or missing article on Wikipedia, related to the literature of labor, and improve it to Good Article status during the duration of the course (3 months).


 * Candidates for wiki work:

William Attaway, Blood on the Forge

Dagoberto Gilb, The Magic of Blood

Barbara Neely, Blanche on the Lam

Philip Levine, What Work Is

Rebecca Harding Davis, Life in the Iron Mills

Important links:

Prof Hanley talk page (for posting messages to me)

Wikipedia class project page

Class motherblog

Introduction for students
Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, is an encyclopedia that can be edited by anyone. It has many millions (!) of editors (Wikipedians), many of whom are students like you. The vast majority of them are volunteers who find editing this site to be an enjoyable experience, even a hobby. Therefore I hope you will enjoy this exercise and the course! After all, there are not many exercises that tell you to do something that over a million people think is 'fun'. :)

Tutorial is the best place to start your adventure with this wiki. Please familiarize yourself with instructions for students and if you have any questions, check the Help:Contents and if you cannot find what you are looking for, ask the friendly people at Help desk - or just contact me.

Before making any major edits, it is recommended that you create an account. You definitely need to have an account before attempting to do any wiki-related coursework (otherwise we will be unable to confirm if you have completed the exercise). After you create an account, if you know your group already, add your name.

Remember that Wikipedia is not a project limited only to our university. We are guests here and we should all behave accordingly. Please make sure you read Wikiquette. Please try to think what impression you want other Wikipedians to have of our university — and of yourselves.

You should expect that the professor, other students, your friends, and even (or especially) other Wikipedia editors (not affiliated with our course) will leave you various messages on your talk pages. When working on the exercises below, you should log in to Wikipedia and check your messages as often as you check your email (I strongly recommend you read 'as often' as 'at least daily'). Whenever you have a new message and are logged to Wikipedia, you will see a large orange message, 'You have new messages', on every Wikipedia page you access. To make this message disappear, you should click on it and read the message. Note that it is customary to leave new messages at the bottom of the talk/discussion pages, and to reply to somebody's messages on their talk pages. If you want to leave somebody a message, make sure you are editing their talk page, not their user page. Remember to sign your talk and discussion messages.

Some other useful tips: whenever you are done with an edit and want to save a page, fill out the edit summary box and view a preview of the page after your edit to make sure it looks as you actually want it to look. Only then click the "Save Page" button. You may find the page history tool and watchlist tools to be very useful when you want to check what changes by other editors have been made to the article(s) you are working on.

Please direct any questions to my talk page. You are welcome to send emails, or drop by to see me during our office hours, and ask about Wikipedia how-to; but please try to find the answer first on the Help:Contents.

Stages and deadlines

 * On Thursday, September 29, we'll introduce the assignment.
 * Start. Get familiar with wikipedia. Make some trial edits, however minor. Demystify the process - having worked on our Democratic Vistas site will help a lot here. As wikipedia puts it, learn to be bold. Learn basic editing skllls.
 * By Thursday, October 6, everyone should have created a Wikipedia account, finished the Wikipedia Tutorial (including making an edit in the Wikipeida Tutorial Sandbox), made at least one constructive edit to Wikipedia (outside the sandbox - subject doesn't matter), joined a group (that includes adding yourself to the linked section below) and informed me (User:profhanley (User_talk:profhanley) about your account name, which group you've joined and the edit(s) you made. You should do so by leaving a message on my talk page. talk page. If you successfully post a diff of your edit to the instructor's Wikipedia talk page you will earn credit.
 * Plan. Minor edits alone won't get us much closer towards Good Article status. We need to have a sense of what more needs to be done, and an overall plan for the article. Look at models (for instance, Vonnegut or El Senor Presidente) and guidelines (e.g. Manual of Style or the Guide for nominating good articles). What sections are required? What will be the article structure? What information is needed? Who in your group will write what?
 * By Thursday, October 13, each group  should have a plan (who will read what, who will work on what aspects of the article) in place. You should create and write preliminary "to-do" list on article talk pages, explaining who will do what, and inform me that you have done so. Each group member should participate in creation of that list, describing their own tasks. If the article does not exist, you should stub (start) it (see what makes a good stub).  Groups which create very good to do lists and stubs may receive extra points.
 * Share. You will need to divide up the tasks that we've identified in the planning stage. Who is going to do what and when?
 * Research. This is vital. A wikipedia article is worth nothing unless it comprises verified research, appropriately referenced. This will entail going to the library, as well as surfing the internet!
 * Assemble and copy-edit. As the referenced research is added to an article, we need to ensure that it does not become baggy and disorganized, though there will be moments when it is obviously in a transitional stage.
 * Informal Reviews. By Thursday, October 27, each of your members should look at an article being developed by others, review it on that article's talk page, and write a summary for your own group (on your own article's talk page) saying whether anything that group has done is valuable for you. You should try to review different articles if possible.
 * Good article nomination. By Tuesday, November 15, at the latest  - - as there's a backlog of articles to be reviewed, and because a nomination can easily be put on hold until the article is improved in line with a reviewer's suggestions.
 * This means your article should be mostly finished by then! But it doesn't mean your work is done, FAR FROM IT! You are responsible for keeping daily track of comments by reviewers (which will include the instructor), answering them and addressing them (if they are reasonable, when in doubt, ask the instructor). Here are some sample Good Article reviews and related discussions: example1, example2, exampe3.


 * I will do the final assessment of your work after Tuesday, December 6.

Important tips
Whenever you edit, make sure that you are signed in (if in the top right corner of the screen you see "log in" button, you are not signed in!). If you are not signed in, I will not be able to verify that you were the person who made the edit and give you points for it.
 * Create an account and sign in every time you edit

When creating a new account, think about the nickname you want to use here. Consider:
 * this is a publicly viewable project - do you want to use your real name a nick?
 * you may want to keep editing Wikipedia in the future - chose a nickname that you won't find annoying in a few years...

Whenever editing a talk page, add four tildes ~ to the end of all comments you make on talk pages. This will let people know who is talking. You can also just press the signature button.
 * Talk pages


 * Candidates for wiki work:

William Attaway, Blood on the Forge

Dagoberto Gilb, The Magic of Blood

Barbara Neely, Blanche on the Lam

Philip Levine, What Work Is

Rebecca Harding Davis, Life in the Iron Mills

We are not doing any original research. You will not be collecting data, analyzing it, or writing about your experiences. We will not be witting an essay with personal opinions or judgments. Instead, we will be writing an encyclopedic article, summarizing an existing, verifiable state of knowledge from a literature-related area. See Wikipedia in brief for a short list of what an encyclopedic article we will be writing here is.
 * What kind of an article are we writing?

At the top of this page you will find a "how to" for nomination. There is also a dedicated guide for nominating good articles. If you can nominate it sooner than the deadline, the better for you - every day gives you more time to read comments by the reviewers and address them. The assignment does not end with the nomination, you will likely have to fix various issues pointed out by the reviewer. If the reviewer posts useful comments, you should do your best to address them; of course this mean you may disagree with him if you think you know better (reviewers are not perfect).
 * Getting the article assessed as a GA

Wikipedia is a project with millions of editors, who collaborate on all articles. We don't own the articles we work on. Don't be surprised if you receive comments from editors who are not part of the course, or if they do edit your article. All editors are here to help; don't hesitate to get extra help - Wikipedia has ton of places you can do so.
 * We don't own the articles

It is likely that over the course of the project, you will receive messages from editors outside our course, and that they will make edits to your article. Be polite in replying, and don't hesitate to ask them to explain something.
 * Expect to interact (politely) with others

A. Don't work on a draft in Microsoft Word. Work on a draft in the article on Wikipedia. This way your colleagues (and instructor) will be aware of what you are doing the instant you do so, and can comment on it sooner.
 * Work on Wikipedia

B. Don't exchange comments by email. Exchange comments by using article's talk pages, for the same reasons as above (unless you are certain that your discussion have to stay private). If you like to receive email notifications, you can monitor the article's talk pages (and your own userpage talk page) by subscribing to that page RSS feed (see Syndication).

Remember: gaining experience with wiki software may be more important to your future career than detailed knowledge of literary canons or forms!

Plagiarism is not only against university's and course policies, it is also against Wikipedia policies (see WP:PLAGIARISM). And attributing somebody doesn't mean cut and paste jobs are allowed (WP:COPYVIO). Violations of plagiarism/copyvio policies will result in lower grade and other sanctions (per university's policy). Please note that the course instructor is not the only person checking constantly for plagiarism and copyright violations; the Good Article reviewer will do so as well, and Wikipedia has a specialized group of volunteers specializing in checking new contributions for those very problems (you don't want your work to appear here or here!). For more info see: Copy-paste, Quotations, Close paraphrasing, a guide from Purdue University.
 * Plagiarism and copyvio warning

You can always ask me for help. You should not hesitate to ask your fellow students from other groups for help, for example if you see they have mastered some editing trick you have yet to learn. We are here to collaborate, not compete. If you can lobby and get help/assistance/advice from other editors to improve your work (for example by using New contributors' help page, Peer review, Help desk or Reference desk), I am perfectly fine with it. Be bold and show initiative, it usually helps.
 * Getting extra help

This is the first time I am running this assignment for my students. However, I am relying on Piotr Konieczyny's extensive experience with wikipedia projects. According to Piotr, here are some common mistakes that may impede your labor:
 * Advice from past assignments
 * read the "getting extra help" tip above
 * try to complete the extra credit assignments outlined here
 * complete WP:TUTORIAL and edit some Wikipedia articles "for fun" early on; experience gained will be very helpful
 * work on a draft on Wikipedia, in the article; don't work in Microsoft Word or such
 * keep an eye on your userpage discussion page, and on article's discussion page, where other group members and other Wikipedia editors - and the instructor - may leave you tips, advice and other comment
 * remember it's a collaborative assignments. Work with your colleagues from the first day on a single wiki-draft. Groups whose members work alone and try to combine their parts a day or so before the final submission don't do very well.
 * don't focus solely on your own sections. Help your teammates by proofreading their section, see if they have trouble with things you've figured out.
 * image questions? See Images, and in particular, the Finding images tutorial and the Picture tutorial. Try to avoid looking for images on "the web", focus on the Wikipedia's sister project, Wikimedia Commons, which has millions of images that can be used on Wikipedia without any restrictions.
 * reference questions? See here on how to add footnotes and proper references to your article

Style guides
To get past the stumbling blocks of GA, articles will have to conform to the Wikipedia style guides. The three largest barriers are:
 * Layout – this guide describes heading and sub-headings.
 * Lead section – the all important abstract at the head of an article.
 * Manual of Style – the collection of rules
 * See what Wikipedia has to say about article development.

Secondary style guide are specific to different projects. Articles must conform to these also. Conflict between any of these is inevitable and troublesome; editors simply have to work out conflicts through consensus.
 * Manual of Style (writing about fiction) - collection of rules for fiction.
 * WikiProject Novels/Style guidelines – mostly lay out issues for articles on novels.

The simplest way to understand the various style guides is to examine articles that have passed GA or FA.

Resources

 * Getting started
 * The perfect article
 * Assessment
 * Article development
 * Good article criteria
 * Guide for nominating good articles
 * Good article review cheatsheet
 * Good article nominations
 * Feature article criteria
 * The differences between good and featured articles
 * How to satisfy Criterion 1a
 * Picture tutorial

Editors in English 630
Course instructor: User:profhanley (Larry Hanley)

(I have borrowed much of the machinery for this assignment from Piotr Konieczyny's sociology projects at U. of Pittsburgh. Thanks, Piotr!)

Questions?
Post them at the discussion page of this article and/or email your course instructor!