User:Prokarylotic Lover/Microbial toxin/Wiskirchensl Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (Prokarylotic Lover)
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Prokarylotic Lover/sandbox

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? The lead is missing the mention of wastewater, clostridial, tetrodotoxins, staphylococcal and viral toxins.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes, very well.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? The lead is missing the mention of wastewater, clostridial, tetrodotoxins, staphylococcal and viral toxins.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? The lead talks about anticancer drugs and other medicines that's not really talked about in the article.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? I think it's good, not overly detailed.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes, it is.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes, almost all sources are within 10 years old.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? I don't think any content is missing. I'm not sure if you need all of the different types of toxins. Since your first paragraph in the led says including bacteria and fungi. it doesn't mention viral.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? Not in a particular position.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? I think the detection methods are a little overrepresented.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No it doesn't.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes, all sources are good.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes, they are thorough.
 * Are the sources current? Yes, sources are current.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes, they work.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes, very easy to follow and read.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No, not that I have found.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes, it's organized.

Images and Media - No images or media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only - Not a new article
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes, I would say that he article is complete.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? Good detail in each of the subtopics.
 * How can the content added be improved? Make sure that all the content headings are introduced and talked about in the lead.