User:PrometheusDOW/National Equal Rights Party/Sarahkoussa Peer Review

General info
PrometheusDOW
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:PrometheusDOW/National Equal Rights Party
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):National Equal Rights Party

Evaluate the drafted changes
LEAD

The lead has been updated to reflect the new content added, and includes a good introductory sentences that describes what the overall article is going to be about. The lead adequately discusses exactly what the reader can expect to see in the coming sections of the article. The lead could be a little more detailed, but over all very concise and well written.

CONTENT

The content seen throughout the article is very relevant in relation to the lead. The content is up-to-date and does not appear to include content that is irrelevant to the context of the article.

The content addresses topics related to historically underrepresented populations (women in the U.S. in the 1880's).

Tone and Balance:

The general tone of the article is very not skewed in either direction, nor is it overtly opinionated. It provides a very neutral perspective of the National Equal Rights Party, their history, leading members, and one significant convention that they were apart of. The portion about Victoria Claflin Woodhull seems very short, however it is understandable, given that there may not be very much information about her in the databases provided by the professor. It seems as though there was much more information to be found about Belva Lockwood, Alfred Love and the Des Moines Convention.

Sources and References:

All links have been checked and do work.The content accurately details what is discussed throughout the article. The sources have been well researched and accurately depict what the writers have chosen to discuss within the article.

Organization:

The content is concise, easy-to-read, as well as easy to follow. There is a clear path and reason for the order in which the writers have chosen to format the article. The content does not appear to have any grammatical or spelling errors. The article follows a clear, simple pattern that perfectly addresses the content.

Images and Media:

The article includes no images.

Overall Impressions:

The content added strongly improves the quality of the existing article. The article is very strong and can be improved by addressing the redundancy of some words used throughout (the use of "many"). Maybe a concluding paragraph could be beneficial, however not entirely necessary.