User:Prss98/BQP/Yllenerad Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Prss98


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Prss98/BQP
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * BQP

Evaluate the drafted changes
So far, there have not been really any edits made in the Sandbox Draft. I see that the lead has not been edited at all yet and one sentence is added to the Article body.

This particular topic seems really interesting and complex. I already see a lot of potential with the way it can be edited to go even more in depth. I can see that a little more can be added to the Lead section to introduce BQP's relationship to other complexity classes. As information is added, I would say to just remember to continue checking in on the Lead section to make sure that it remains relevant to the Article Body, without exposing too much or being too repetitive.

In the Article body, the sentence added seems to already be going in the right track. I suggest possibly expounding more of the definition, as many people may have a hard time to understand BQP. What is it really used for? The article should help the audience understand so they can fully grasp the topic.

The images in the original article seem well-captioned to depict this algorithm. Due to this, it may be more important to simplify this concept because many of the symbols and terms used will be unfamiliar to a general audience.

Overall, the original article seems to do well addressing history, although the information can still be enriched. The original article uses several reputable sources, which may be further incorporated to strengthen readers' understanding of the topic. There is a lot of room for improvement in the article and draft. There are not many critiques that can be made at the moment as the Sandbox draft has not been edited as much; however, even with a small content I can see that it will go in a positive direction to bring more clarity to BQP!