User:Prude.rager01/Chamicero de Perijá/Axolotl21 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username)
 * Prude.rager01
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Prude.rager01/sandbox

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * The lead was heavily improved in order to provide background information on the topic.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes, the lead does include and introductory sentence. It gives a description of the Chamicero as well as the its location and establishment.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * The lead includes a brief description of the geography and the biodiversity, but not really on the politics and founding sections. Maybe a sentence with the issue that rises because of the politics would be good.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Yes, the lead has more updated and detailed information that wasn't present before.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * The lead is concise which is helpful to transition into the main article sections.

Lead evaluation
Ultimately, the lead is good and has detailed information. If anything, maybe include a sentence on the politics section, but it is fine as it is as well.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Yes, the content is relevant and in detail, especially the new details about biodiversity and the geography of the sector.
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * The content is highlights important dates, but it is not clear if it is up to date. Has anything occurred in the area more recently, especially in the politics section?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * If anything, maybe more information on the scientists role when entering the forest in the political section would be helpful.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?
 * I would argue that is does since the Chamicero is located in Colombia and is not the political issues is not something that is widely talked about.

Tone and balance evaluation
The information presented in the edited article are not biased. They represent facts. The only area where there could be any form of biased in the political section, but even then, the author does a good job in staying on the point and explaining the problem. The author continues to explain the events that stemmed from the problem. Overall, the tone is neutral and there is a balance in that section.

Sources and references evaluation
The sources are not outdated, but maybe include a more current source, if available. Additionally, may want to recheck that all the links work since there were some that led to sites that didn't contain the right information or did not seem reliable, however, that may have been only on my end. In the end, just double check. The sources seem to be secondary sources, but see if there has been any peer reviewed or scientific articles regarding the area or the main sections of it.

Organization evaluation
The edits are well organized and make it clear for the reader. Overall, good job with the main sections. However, I would recommend revisiting the politics and founding section and maybe split the information presented into different paragraphs just to help the reader understand the difference in the topics or include a transition sentence to help the reader understand the relationship between the politics and foundation of it. I could not find any spelling or major grammatical error so good job!

Images and media evaluation
The images and media help the reader understand the diversity of the area and are well captioned. Taking it a step further, maybe include a map of the area or even more images of the different kinds of animals found in the area.