User:Pscil/Rwandan Red Cross/Tommygoodwin Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Pscil


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pscil/Rwandan_Red_Cross?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Rwandan Red Cross

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead: lead is concise and well written. You can add a little bit more of what is to come in your article in your lead. Lead contains relevant information to the topic and is not too wordy.

Content/Sources: Article content before only had one sentence of information. You added (or started adding) relevant information that is necessary to your topic. Sources are all recent and from a multitude of backgrounds not just western ones.

Tone: Tone is neutral and not opinionated. Clearly written and organized.

Thank you, I will make sure to incorporate this feedback into my final draft!