User:Pseaton/sandbox

William Manning (1747-1814) was a New England farmer, foot soldier and author. After fighting in the American Revolutionary War, he began to believe that his service and labor meant little to those in charge. He soon became a member of the Jeffersonian Republican Party (otherwise known as the Democratic-Republican Party) in response to the day’s ruling Federalist Party. As the years passed and his distrust in government built, he wrote multiple papers about the corruptness of the “Few” and what the “Many” endured because of it. In 1798, after much dismay, his wrote his most famous work, The Key of Libberty (later corrected to The Key of Liberty), in which he explained that the goal of the Few was to distress and force the Many into financially depending on them, creating a continued cycle of dependence. The Many’s only hope was to vote for leaders that would fight for those with lesser power and urge for smaller government. His work, however, would not be published for more than a century, suggesting that the Few did not enjoy Manning’s observations.

Early Life
William Manning was born in Billerica, MA, in 1747. His paternal ancestors came to Massachusetts from England during the Puritan migration. The farm he was born on was the same farm that his great-grandfather worked on and lived. On that farm, built in 1696 and referred to as the Old Manse, Manning and his wife, Sarah, raised 10 of their 13 children.

Manning lived a life of “Yankee yeomanry”—a group of small, free holding farmers—like his ancestors and lived in a village named Hampden that was well off. The farm, itself, was formerly used as a garrison house during the Indian wars and, afterwards, served as a tavern. Many of the original books from the tavern are still in existence.

Military Career
Little is known of Manning’s military career, other than the fact that it inspired him to write his later works. On April 19, 1775, while serving in Captain Solomon Pollard’s company at age 27, he responded too late to the alarm of the Battle of Lexington and Concord in the American Revolutionary War. He was appointed second lieutenant shortly afterwards and served two terms as a selectman in Billerica many years later.

Budding Philosophy: “The Few and the Many”
During the war, Manning took up the ideas of liberty and free government, meant to prevent tyranny of the majority. He said after watching the first blood shed at Concord and witnessing men die for liberty, a permanent scar formed on his mind. At first, he found it impossible to accept a free government and to write his ideas on it—thinking that tyranny would never happen—until the signing of Jay’s Treaty of 1794, proposed by Chief Justice of the Supreme Court John Jay. He was sent to England to seek solutions during the crumbling relationship of Britain and America following the war. As a result, the treaty included: a) a withdrawal of British soldiers from posts in the American West, b) a commission to settle border issues between America and Canada, and c) a commission to resolve the American losses in British ship seizures and Loyalist losses during the Revolutionary War. It did not, however, demand that the British stop arresting American ships and seamen. It was backed by Secretary of Treasury Alexander Hamilton, a Federalist, signed under the pen name Camillus in November 1794. Though it met much criticism, President George Washington pushed for its ratification and Jay's Treaty passed the Senate in June 1795.

Manning referred to Jay's Treaty as "the monster," noting that Jay and his supporters did not care if American seamen, whom are of one of the lowest ranks in the Navy, did not receive justice for being arrested and tortured by the British. He, a former soldier, naturally felt sympathy for his fellow servicemen and acknowledged that the elite's treatment of the seamen must be similar to their treatment the other American citizens of lesser status. As Jennifer R. Mercieca and James Arnt Aune noted in their article "A Vernacular Republican Rhetoric: William Manning's Key of Libberty," historian Thomas Gustafson would refer to Jay's Treaty as one of the great controversies of the 1790s and as part of a "Thucydidean moment," a point "where a republic confronts the reality that political and linguistic disorders are one in the same." This was Manning's reality.

The treaty indignantly stirred Manning's political and moral feelings and encouraged him to write, but it was not his sole source of content. His writings also incorporated opposition to leading politicians and policies of his day. He despised Hamilton’s financial plan following the Revolutionary War, of which the federal government would assume the war debts of the states, creating a cycle of financial dependence on the federal government while encouraging creditors to preserve it. Hamilton also proposed a national bank, solidifying the government’s power and creating a strong national credit. Manning also despised Washington’s foreign policy, of which he controlled treaty negotiations with hostile power—especially that of the Native Americans—and asked for congressional approval afterwards. He also sent American missionaries overseas for negotiations without legislative approval and pretended, in Manning's opinion, to cater to the needs of non-elite and working citizens, the majority, by promoting free trade and increasing demand during America’s involvement in European wars. However, it would be found in many treaties of the day, including Jay’s Treaty, that the rights of everyday citizens in those treaties were not of importance. Manning believed each of those policies enabled the government to become too big and its people too small.

Using his Jeffersonian Republican beliefs as a basis (though Thomas Jefferson would not become president until 1801), Manning believed that any policies that reflected Hamilton, Washington or Jay’s policies created the poisonous atmosphere and ideology of “the Few and the Many.” Manning distinguished the Few as the small group of elite, rich and powerful men that held the fate of the country in their hands and the Many, including himself, as those facing economic and educational setbacks, not being able to have their voices heard due to their limited circumstances. This became Manning’s emphasis throughout most of his works.

The Key of Libberty
In 1798, 15 years after the end of the Revolutionary War and the signing of the Treaty of Paris, Manning wrote his most famous text, The Key of Libberty. In it, he further defined the distinction between the Few and the Many. He said that the Few, of which did not produce labor, and their incomes relied primarily on interests, rents, salaries and fees fixed on the nominal value of money. He said that they preferred money to be scarce and labor to be produced at as low of a cost as possible. Manning wrote, “For instance if the prices of labour & produce should fall one halfe if would be just the same to the few as if their rents fees & salleryes ware doubled, all which they would git out of the many.” On the other hand, Manning continued, if the Many doubled the prices of labor and produce, they would pay off their debts and enjoy not being financially dependent on the Few. Some of the biggest threats to the Many, however, were people working in the judicial and executive branches of federal government, especially lawyers. He said that they were continuously interested in having money scarce and their people in distress. The scarcer the money, they believed, the lower the cost of produce and the more distressed the people became, the better. It, therefore, not only doubled the nominal value of their fees and salaries, but doubled and tripled their income, forcing the people to beg for forgiveness, patience and forbearance. Manning wrote, “This gratifyes both their pride & covetousness, when on the other hand when money is plenty & prices high they have little or nothing to do. This is the Reason why they aught to be kept intirely from the Legislative Body....” In Manning’s earlier text, an article titled “Some Proposals,” of which he harped on his loathing of Hamilton’s financial policy, he merely explained the difference between the Few and the Many as a fight over monetary policy, whereas in Libberty, he explained it as disputes between labor, property and free government.

Throughout the text, Manning also explained that the Many feared that the Few would form an elite society backed by a federalist government that would shun the Jeffersonian Republican Party and its ideas (a fear, some would say, would match the day's reality). He encouraged the Many to not trust the government with their best interests and to elect officials that supported limited government.

Though the identification and tensions of the Few and the Many was Manning’s main focus, he also dedicated time to explaining key events leading to the need of such explanations. One of the events was Shays’ Rebellion, or “On the Shais Affair in Maschusets” as noted in the text. Cycles of depression and indulgence followed the Revolutionary War, only to be exacerbated by Massachusetts’ regulation of money and debt while British creditors called in their debts from the war. Merchants turned to farmers and rural traders that could not afford to pay their debts and, in turn, put them in prison. Daniel Shays, a former leader of the revolutionary militia, responded by leading an uprising in Western Massachusetts, closing the courts and preventing seizure of property. Massachusetts Governor James Bowdoin later ordered military forces to scatter the rebels. By living in close proximity, Manning gave an eye-witness account of the experience and asked the Many to form organized groups of labor and interests to prevent such happenings in the future.

Forming such groups, in addition to voting for representatives that would fight for smaller government and the rights of the Many, is what Manning referred to as the ultimate key of libberty.

Political Atmosphere following Libberty
Manning’s many attempts to publish The Key of Libberty failed. He originally sent a copy of Libberty to the Independent Chronicle, but Republicans at that paper refused to publish it because its remedy of an organized group of laborers possibly publishing their own monthly magazine would put many Republicans out of work. Anyone who published anything against President John Adams, a Federalist, and/or the war faced imprisonment, including Thomas Adams (of no relation to the president), editor of the Chronicle, and Abijah Adams, his brother and clerk. The Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798 were in effect and Jeffersonian Republicans were deemed traitors, causing his work to take a back seat.

Manning would regain confidence after Thomas Jefferson, a supporter of smaller government, defeated Adams in the election of 1800. His beliefs and actions as president, however, were overshadowed by Adams’ eleventh hour appointment of John C. Marshall, a Federalist, as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. His rulings often mirrored the beliefs of the once-ruling party.

Death
On October 21, 1814, shortly before the Hartford Convention, of which the Federalist Party would ultimately meet its demise, William Manning died of an unknown cause on his farm in Hampden. He was survived by his widow, several married children and his unmarried children—William, Jephthah, Sarah, Lucretia, Luna, Roxa, Lucinda and Jerusha. They maintained the farm until 1857, when the last survivor moved away.

Posthumous Work and Modern Comparisons
The Key of Libberty would not be published until 1922 with a forward by Harvard University historian Samuel Eliot Morison, in which he said, “It used to be said of him by his friends that if William Manning drowned, they would seek his body up-stream, for he would surely not float down with the current like other people.”

His ideas are mirrored in the ongoing Tea Party Movement, of which its members believe that the government is made of an elite group of people, the Few, which do not cater to its citizens, the Many, and distrust the government because of it. They have taken it upon themselves to form organized groups based on their own interests. Manning’s ideas are also mirrored in the ongoing international Occupy Movement, stemming from the original Occupy Wall Street Movement in New York. Its participants believe that the wealthiest citizens of the country, the Few, represent the 1% of the population that can force their influence on financial and legislative policies while the rest, the Many (of which they belong), represent the 99% of the population that are hindered by the policies that the Few make and/or support. This group is highly active and adamant in their beliefs and often camp outside of government and corporate buildings across the world, proclaiming that they will protest uninterruptedly until the government changes.