User:Psun23/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Dandelion coffee

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I choose to evaluate this article because I am a big fan of drinking dandelion coffee (tea) and thought the page could use a lot of updating and work. There is a good amount of benefits and more recent studies on the tea, which I thought could help improve the article page.

Evaluate the article
Lead Section:

- Contains a good overview of the subject, but doesn't help lay out the sections of the article. While most citations are reliable, there are a few sources that lack either a proper citation or a reliable one

Content:

- The content is mostly relevant, however, there is a little bit of older data listed. There are more research and health effects that should be listed within the article.

Tone and Balance:

- The article is neutral and fair

Sources and References:

- Most sources are good, however, there are a few that have issues with unreliability or need a medical citation. There are more recent and better quality studies that should be added.

Organization and Writing Quality:

- This section checks all the points; no mistakes and has a structure.

Images and Media:

- Overall yes, however, I think that including a photo of the dandelion coffee as a drink would help the reader understand what it looks like when brewed.

Talk Page Discussion:

- There is only one person who contributed to the talk page asking if anyone had a good resource for an interesting historic part of the subject

Overall Impressions:

- The overall status hasn't been given to this article, which may be due to it being a stub. The article provides a good overview of the subject, but could use help expanding and improving the quality of citations and information. I would say this article is underdeveloped, especially when looking at other article pages for teas.