User:Ptilothrix/Melissopalynology/Dizzledip Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

@Ptilothrix


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Ptilothrix/Melissopalynology
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Melissopalynology

Evaluate the drafted changes
~

Great draft thus far. The material you have gathered will be a great addition to the previous version. You have outlined your sections well in a way that makes sense and is easy to follow. The lead/Introduction could use a little more information but as I write that, it looks like you're in the middle of doing so!

The methodology is a great addition and I think a little more info would go a long way, like how you mentioned you will go into the process and how it works. In all, the material is relevant and on the right track. It certainly adds to what was a lacking article before your work. Maybe some images to add as you finalize?

Again, looks good, great work. My biggest feedback: I would suggest adding a little more to the conservation implications, that could expand into subsections even further if the time/interest was there for you, just an interesting perspective you've introduced and I think would add to the article. Also, as mentioned, more in the lead/introduction, possibly summarizing some of the methods or other sections you add. Great work and congrats on graduation! So Close!

Best,

Jake Warren

@Dizzledip

~