User:Public Scrutony/Ancient Christian Commentary on Scripture/Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Peer Review

I really enjoyed reading this article! The feedback below are mostly stylistic comments.

Lead:

-Great first sentence, sets the stage well for the topic

-I would maybe move the sentence “The ACCS is a confessionally collaborative project...” up and use it as the second sentence, that way you have the general statements at the beginning and then you can move into more detail as the paragraph continues on

Format Section:

-Maybe split this one paragraph into two

-The second paragraph could start from the sentence, “The ACCS editorial team employed the latest in digital technology...”

Mission and Scope Section:

-I would remove the “Thus” (it might be a little too academic and takes away from the neutrality)

-Maybe move the final paragraph into a new section; it seems like thematically it could have its own section with a title like “Influence” or “Influence on Other Projects” since it doesn’t seem to fit in completely with under the topic “Mission and Scope”

Overall:

-Great job on including all of the links to other Wikipedia articles!

-Section headings are all very clear

-Treatment of sources is very clear and appropriate, and a neutral tone is maintained throughout (also direct quotes are well integrated into the body of the article)