User:Publicduck/Workplace communication/KoolKat1031 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Publicduck


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Publicduck/Workplace communication
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Workplace communication
 * Workplace communication

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Although there are minor grammatical errors, the draft is a good start. It adds new information to the article that is relevant to the topic at hand. The sources are also reputable and give better context for the information written for the article. Some sentences can be rephrased to take out unnecessary words and have a stronger neutral tone as well.