User:Puddleglum2.0/CVUA/Blanking

Draft questions for a new CVUA course section, drafted per request of on my TP. {{ping|Girth Summit]} Here's what I got. I find I can explain things pretty well, but putting it into question form is a whole different thing. Cheers. -- puddleglum  2.0  23:11, 17 July 2020 (UTC) Ha, no wonder you didn't see this! Apologies for the ping mistake, should really start using the preview button a lot more! with the curly brace. Thank you! Cheers -- puddleglum  2.0  22:07, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Hey PG - thanks for the ping, worked this time! Yes, that looks good to me - those are some useful links to point them towards, including the essay which I hadn't come across before. I tweaked the wording slightly, just to make it flow a bit better - feel free to revert if you disagree, but I think this is good to go into the course now. Girth Summit  (blether)  17:27, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Sometimes during your patrolling for vandalism, you'll come across an edit that removes most, if not all, of the content from an article or section. It's easy to simply revert, warn, and continue on, but actually, these kind of edits usually require even more attention than the average malicious edit. Accidentally reverting helpful blanking is one of the main pitfalls that newer vandalism patrollers can fall into, so in order to avoid this situation, please read the following pages and answer the questions.

Before you answer these questions, it may be helpful to read WP:BLANK, WP:CR, and this user essay.

How could a blanking edit be helpful?

What are some of the main things to look for in an edit that blanks a lot of text?

Please find three examples of an edit that blanks content, and explain why they are either good or bad.