User:Puhpaya/Evaluate an Article

The article I am evaluating is: Public interest design


 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * I think that everything was relevant!
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * I'm not qualified to say that there are things that are missing from the article. The last edit was on May 6th, 2023, so I'm sure that the information is updated. The latest date in the actual article was 2015 though.
 * Can you identify any notable equity gaps? Does the article underrepresent or misrepresent historically marginalized populations?
 * I think the article does a good job emphasizing that design/architecture is not just for the rich. Populations that are mentioned are low-income and underserved communities.
 * What else could be improved?
 * Maybe a few pictures of example designs/buildings!


 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * I think that the article is pretty neutral, but I also am not a great judge of tone of writing. I don't feel swayed one way or the other.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * I'm not even sure that there are any viewpoints?!


 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * The links work but I think one of the sources was deleted on its own site. There isn't any information from these sources that is being misrepresented.
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * I'm pretty sure some of these sources are not going to be neutral -- one of them is a website that is selling/introducing a textbook for public interest design. Another is an opinion piece from the NYT. I think that these references are not not neutral.
 * Do the sources come from a diverse array of authors and publications?
 * Yes!


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * I don't think that there are any conversations, but there was a question that was posed: "Is there a clear definition of "public interest design" vs a "non-public interest design?"".
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * There were three comments. One was the question, one said it was part of a WikiProject, and one said it was a lovely article!
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * I'm not sure if we've discussed this in class. I do think that Wikipedia tries to discuss things in an unbiased way.