User:Pumpkiinss03/Sexual script theory/Dimsumyo Peer Review

General info
Pumpkiinss03
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Pumpkiinss03/Sexual script theory
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Sexual script theory

Evaluate the drafted changes
Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?

Everything in the article is relevant to the article topic. Sexual Script Theory is a new topic for me, so I feel I learned a lot. I wasn't distracted by anything.

Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

I feel that this article is very neutral. I don't detect any claims or frames that appear heavily biased toward a particular position.

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

I don't detect viewpoints that are overrepresented or underrepresented. Everything is neutral.

Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?

The links and citations do work and support the claims.

Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?

All sources are neutral and come from reliable references.

Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?

All information is up to date. The article is really informative.

Peer Review Response from Pumpkiinss03:
Thank you Dimsumyo for your review. I applied all your constructive criticism to my article and appreciate the time you took to review my article. You're article was great as well. Thank you!

General info
Dimsumyo
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Dimsumyo/Agenda-setting theory
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Agenda-setting theory

Evaluate the drafted changes
I'''s everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?'''

Yes, everything in the article is relevant. Nothing distracted me and it is very informative.

I'''s the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?'''

Yes, the article is neutral. It reads very unbiased and clear of any frames or claims that are biased towards a certain position.

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

All viewpoints are represented fairly. Nothing seems to be over or underrepresented.

'''Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?'''

The citations and links work and they support the claims of the article.

'''Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?'''

There is no bias noted in the article. All the facts seem supported by appropriate and reliable references. They seem to come from reliable scholarly sources.

'''Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?'''

No information seems outdated. Nothing seems missing at this time.