User:Purpleuser

As an editor, I have two goals:


 * 1) My primary goal is to proofread and conduct detailed line edits on website text to enhance readers' experiences on Wikipedia.
 * 2) My secondary goal is to adjust phrasing to ensure neutral tonality in an increasingly hostile political environment. Wikipedia should be a place of neutral language and tonality. Although both novice users and experienced editors can claim to be representatives of neutrality and "fact-based editing," this is most often not the reality of these situations; their implicit biases inevitably generate content and language that is far from neutral. This is not unique to any specific political party or country. I have zero tolerance for this type of behavior, and encourage users and editors to take a step back before entering edit wars. My sole goal is promote neutrality, and I could not care less whether you have some personal belief that something should be phrased a certain way.