User:Pyruvate kinase/AIDS-defining clinical condition/Pricejones14 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Pyruvate kinase


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * AIDS-defining clinical condition
 * AIDS-defining clinical condition

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The content given in the sandbox is very beneficial and also clear. The writer mentions at the bottom of his work that all of the information written is for the pages introduction. The content given does not seem to be biased in any way which is a good thing. I think this information is really good. I was going to say that there are certain things, such as the different stages that you could go in more detail over however this is just an introduction so I think that what you have looks good. Some advice I would give is that it may be beneficial to go in more detail over some statistics of its prevalence over the years.