User:Qaiassist

Good morning again MrOlle.

I trust all is well and appreciate your effort to get back to me.

I have reviewed you latest message and am becoming more and more confused with the protocols and rules. I have re-read the rules/protocols in relation to "references" and they suggest every article should be referenced by a book, magazine article, blog material.

In creating the "Integrated IT Methodology" article I have made reference to some of the leading Project Management organizations in the world where this content has been published. More specifically (a) a newsletter with Project Management Institute (Houston) (b) several whitepapers and blogs from industry leading project management vendors (AceProject and Project Insight) (c)a top five article posted in the leading Canadian Project Management magazine (Project Times) (d) a number of white papers and blog articles in a leading Project Management Media Outlet (Smart Projects).

My intent here is provide users of wikipedia access to the same type of knowledge being proposed and sponsored by these industry leading Project Management organizations. My interest here is not (a) to break or circumvent the rules and protocols of wikipedia (b) wasting your precious time in having to converse with me about interpreting and applying those protocols(c) wasting my time in debating the intepretation of the wikipedia rules and protocols - im perfectly OK if wikipedia does think the article can be beneficial to the users.

Again I want to thank you for your patience and am looking forward to any suggestions (besides the vagueness of the "article does not meet the referencing guidelines") or recommendation you might care to make so that wikipedia users might benefit from the article.

Thanks. Cameron.