User:Qaniaf/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Addison Rae

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

Addison Rae is one of the most famous and talked about celebrity in the teenage world right now. The reason that I chose this topic is because the article still has so much room for improvement off the bat, thus since Addison is famous, there are lots of secondary sources that will put out information and news about her so it would not be hard to find sources for references. Why this topic matters is that social media and its platforms seem to really put a big influence, especially on Gen-Zs and teenagers. Addison Rae is one of the these big influencers that sets forth in being a role model for these people so I thought it would be important to improve her article on Wikipedia so that people have a better understanding of who she is and what she has achieved to be so popular. My preliminary impression was that I was a bit surprised that her page was a stub because of how famous she is, I thought there would be a lot of her fans that ought to write a lot of things about her but I guess not. There's still a lot of information that I know about her that has not been written in the article so my knowledge about her may be an advantage in improving the article.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The article definitely has several strong introductory information on it, however there could be more sections and details that can be added on. Here are my suggestions.


 * The lead section is considered short and precise but consists of the relevant details. It has just enough information to explain the basic information to someone who doesn't know who Addison Rae is.
 * Although maybe I suggest changing the first sentence describing who she is from "social media personality, dancer, and actress" to "social media personality and TikTok star" because it emphasizes more of what she's known for, which are exactly that, thus Addison is not known to be an actress and as for dancing, she only dances for TikTok so it's better to note her as those.
 * The content are relevant to the topic and is sure is up to date, but there could be more sections added on to it such as;
 * Early life - This section can discuss Addison's life before she was TikTok famous e.g. her education, hobbies.
 * Endorsements - As she is now partnered up with a lot of brands, there could be a section to elaborate the different kinds of endorsement she has done.
 * Relationships - Addison has now been seen with a lot of other famous celebrities, whether it's her romantic interests or friendships, her relationships are often talked about. Several examples would be her relationship with the Kardashian family, James Charles, David Dobrik, and her current boyfriend, Bryce Hall.
 * Appearances - This section can talk about where Addison have appeared on in famous platforms such as her interview on Ellen, being a guest star in Vogue's video, and becoming a presenter in Billboard Music Awards.
 * The article gives off a righteous tone and balance in which the writings are not at all biased in anyway, the subject is not underrepresented or overrepresented, nor does the tone come off as persuading the readers. The article is simply stating facts about the subject as it is.
 * The section "Career" seems have information all over the place. I suggest to appropriate input sub-sections according to the matter discuss, such as when they're writing about Addison's past education, it could be under the "Early life" section.
 * I suggest to input a better picture of her where it's HD and it captures a better personality instead of the one that's on it right now.
 * Overall, the article can be improved by inserting more information and dividing the current ones into the appropriate sections. But there are no major flaws or error in the article as of right now.