User:Qian Mateo/Terebratalia transversa/Renhin Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Qian Mateo


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Terebratalia transversa
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Terebratalia transversa

Evaluate the drafted changes
The article about Terebratalia transversa began strong, with an introductory sentence that described what the species is and the taxonomy that is relevant. The introduction paragraph is concise and descriptive, and provides enough information for a reader to understand what the rest of the article will be about.

The content that is within the article is relevant and up-to-date. From my perspective, there isn't any information that is missing or content that doesn't belong. I believe that the article fills a gap in information since there wasn't this much information about the species accessible in one space.

The article's content is neutral. There aren't any claims that appear heavily biased towards a particular position, and the content is truly factual.

There are reliable secondary sources of information within the article, all cited at the bottom of the article. The content accurately reflects what the cited sources say and pulls information from a variety of different areas within those sources. The sources are current, and I believe that they reflect the available literature on the topic. I don't believe that there are better sources available since this topic is so niche, so the author did a good job of finding available information. The links I checked work.

The content is well-written and easy to read, and I didn't find any grammatical or spelling errors. The content is broken down into great sections.

There aren't any images or media, but the table with the taxonomy is easy to understand.

The article meet's the notability requirements, has seven reliable sources that reflect available literature, follows a pattern of similar articles for species, and contains necessary sections and headings to accurately display the information presented.

The strengths of the article are the different sections and the organization, as well as the amount of information presented. I would suggest adding an image of the species, but other than that, I don't have any other comments.