User:Qrsx/sandbox

Article Evaluation: Airline Seating Sex Discrimination Controversy

The information in the article related to the article topic. There was no information that seemed to distract me from the article. In the article it did not seem to have much bias toward a certain position. Although, it mainly focused on the fact that men are "more dangerous" when it comes to sitting next to unaccompanied minors than women. That is the main point, but I think that more information behind the airline policies should be stated. There are a lot of examples stating why people felt they were being discriminated against, but there was nothing on why people thought the policy should be. I think it focused on peoples stories and how they felt, instead of focusing on both parts of the controversy. I checked a few cites and they support the claims made in the article. There is some pieces in the cites that I feel the editors could have added because they seemed like they would be important, too. There was one source that the article had sited from Daily Mail and I personally do not trust this site because they published an article about my high school and most of the information was twisted and invalid. With my experience with Daily Mail I feel as though it is a very biased form of news and they tend to leave out important facts or twist information making it more eye-catching. The information presented in the Daily Mail cite doesn't really seem to add up with that in the wiki article. Daily Mail said "it has banned children from sitting next to male strangers" not Males cannot sit next to unaccompanied children. I did not see any information used that was out of date or that could be added. The types of conversations going on behind the scenes are mainly about whether the title gives enough insight into what the article is about and whether the word "sex" should be in the title or not. There is a lot of controversy on the talk page about what an appropriate title is for the page. Right now the article is rated a C. This article is part of a bunch of wikiprojects. Some topics include Discrimination projects and Men's Issues projects. This article differs from the way that we have talked about discrimination in class by who's being discriminated against. We have mainly talked about religion, labeling and language switching. The discrimination that we have talked about was about religion and labeling which had to do with many different groups, while in this article it's mainly dealing with men. Overall, I think this is a good topic and has a lot of potential to become a great article.

hi

Wiki Project Article: Erotic Plasticity

I think that the section under the opening paragraph regarding "female erotic plasticity hypothesis" should be moved down under the section titled Female erotic plasticity hypothesis because it would help the article to be more organized. I think that statement, "The female erotic plasticity hypothesis states that women have higher erotic plasticity than men, and therefore their sex drives are more socially flexible and responsive than those of men (factors such as religion, culture and education have a greater effect on women’s sexual behaviors)" should be cited as well because it is stating a definition and there should be a source verifying that is what the hypothesis consists of.

It should be moved under this section and used as the first sentence/statement in the paragraph to define the section title.Qrsx (talk) 16:56, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

I also think that the statement, "Men, on the other hand, remain relatively rigid after puberty but can still be affected by these factors" either should be taken out or moved because it's not talking about the female erotic plasticity hypothesis. I also think that it should be cited because it seems like this information is more opinionated.Qrsx (talk) 16:33, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

I believe that the section "Benuto" should be moved under the section of "Erotic Plasticity Questionnaire" where they are discussing her study and all about it. ALThomas40 (talk) 01:47, 22 March 2018 (UTC)ALThomas40

I think that this sentence should be rewritten "Someone has "high erotic plasticity" when their sex drives can be affected by situational, social and cultural influences, whereas someone with “low erotic plasticity” has a sex drive that is relatively rigid and unsusceptible to change"

changed to: ""high erotic plasticity" describes someone when their sex drive can be affected by situational, social, and cultural influences, while "low erotic plasticity" describes someone when their sex drive is relatively rigid and unsusceptible to change" ALThomas40 (talk) 17:43, 22 March 2018 (UTC)ALThomas40

"According to Baumeister, the culture a woman is raised in affects her sexual attitudes and behaviours more than it would affect a man raised in the same culture. Factors such as politics, cultural and societal views on sexual behaviours would all play a role" needs to be cited and behaviors needs to be spelled correctly ALThomas40 (talk) 17:48, 22 March 2018 (UTC)ALThomas40

Wiki Project Article: Erotoic Plasticity - Justin Rowland

Right after Female erotic plasticity hypothesis section they should put the Male erotic plasticity hypothesis because in the article it says that its a both way thing, but woman's is stronger then men, which means that culture, and society can have a bigger impact on their sex drive than men. Justin March 27th

The article talks about Erotic plasticity but I think it should be sectioned up into women's and mens because they are two totally different symptoms and behaviors, also this is related to women.

They should take out shibley hyde and durik and Benuto and make it into a separate hyper link on the page because it is personal stories which could be made into another wikipedia page instead of on the main Erotic Plasticity page.

Baumeisters theory about how education affects woman and men differently doesn't explain why and how and just goes on to basic detail, they should go in more deep on how they affected it and what test or surveys he ran

Other then that there was no information or topics that ran away from the article and that should be improved April 5th, 2018

Women have a higher erotic plasticity then men becuase of their sexual differences, it is unknown why womens is higher but as though the women have a lesser sex drive then mens. (Justin Rowland) April 24th, 2018