User:Qtreacy/Ophiocoma wendtii/Jerseygirl1999 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Qtreacy


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Ophiomastix wendtii


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Ophiocoma wendtii

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

I like how your lead has a clear introduction sentence and is very concise. You may want to include another sentence in your lead so it fully encompasses all the sections of your article. All of your content appears to be relevant to the article and uses a neutral tone. All of your included links to other Wikipedia pages work, and all sources appear relevant and up-to-date. I didn't notice any grammatical mistakes, and your organization of information makes logical sense. My only suggestion would be to move the sentence about O. wendtii being light-averse from the habitat section to the behavior section. Your images add to the viewer's understanding of the article. Overall, you did a good job at improving the quality of this pre-existing article.