User:Quaquaversalll/Blue Prism Painting I/Italex128 Peer Review

General info
Quaquaversalll
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Quaquaversalll/Blue Prism Painting I
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * The article is well supported with references, and very little apparent bias.
 * The article is missing a Lead section and does not have any subsections.
 * The first and second paragraphs are about the artist and not the art, and probably belong on the artist's own wiki page.
 * The first sentence of the third paragraph would make a good lead.
 * The third paragraph is well written and supported, although it relies on only one reference.
 * Two of the references were missing links. The ISBN links did not work for me (the search page linked did not return any results). The one link to the Nature article worked perfectly.