User:Quarantineditor/Kerry Washington/Quarantineditor Peer Review

Lead:

 * Yes, the lead does include an introductory sentence. It describes the articles topic not so well though. I feel like it gives too much information.
 * The one sentence, or the lead? No, that sentence is only twelve words long. The paragraph has too much information? I actually agree, if that's your point, but you need to indicate what precisely needs to be done.
 * No, but they have a key to list the major sections in the article.
 * No, everything that is listed in the lead is also in the article itself.
 * Yes, the lease is very overly detailed in my opinion.
 * Explain, in some detail, please.

Content:

 * All the content present is about or related to Kerry Washington.
 * Yes, considering we just begun 2021 and new shows have really came out, everything seems to be update and correct.
 * No, I cannot say. Honestly everything is broken into a certain amount of years and each section have relevant information for it.

Tone and Balance:

 * Yes, everything seems to be written in a very neutral tone. I see no signs of someone favoring her.
 * No.
 * No, everything seems to equally talked about with the information given for her.
 * No, I do not feel persuading.

Sources and References:

 * Yes, at the bottom there are various sources from were they author got all their information from.
 * Yes it does.
 * I am not so sure about that. This article is huge, but it's used only to verify her heritage, as one of three sources. Is that necessary? Why wasn't it used to add some information on what she said about filming Django Unchained? The only thing the article says is that the movie was "critically acclaimed", but that has nothing to do with her. Read the article: there's valuable material in there, and without that kind of information these articles are just lists of factoids.
 * Yes, each link will take to a valid website on where they got their information.
 * Yes, everything is current.
 * Not sure where to find that.
 * You could check to see whether the sources are all hits from mainstream (read, mostly white) publications, whether there's any from media geared toward African-American readership: see Category:African-American_mass_media.
 * Not sure, maybe no.
 * "(You may need to do some digging to answer this.)" Dr Aaij (talk) 15:13, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, all the ones I clicked worked.

Organization:

 * The content is organized very well. The information is easy to find and the section all have headers on them.
 * No, from my knowledge everything is spelled correctly.
 * Yes, everything is titled and the information under matches the title.

Images and Media:

 * No pictures were added.
 * Every image on the article has a caption under it.
 * Yes, considering the article has no orange box at the top.
 * Yes, each image is laid out to be pleasing to the eye.

Overall Impression:

 * My overall impression is that the article was planed out very well. The author executed the organization and information neatly and in a good way for the reader to understand what is being talked about. I support the way they wrote this article.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)


 * Kerry Washington

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)