User:Quercusfanatic/Mast (botany)/Konniehatz Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

I am reviewing Mast (botany) written by: Quercusfanatic


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Quercusfanatic/Mast_%28botany%29?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Mast (botany)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Overall, I thought that this article was fairly well written. I found that it went into an appropriate amount of detail and properly explained any jargon associated with the cultural impacts of mast. Things that I would suggest to improve upon before handing in the final draft would be the references. At the end of the article, in the references section, it is clear to see that the author did adequate research before they wrote Mast (botany): Culture, yet there are no hyperlinks to these references at any point in the article.

For example: "...He notes that when the Spartans consulted the Oracle of Delphi regarding if they should attempt to challenge the Arcadians, she referred to them as "acorn eaters [1].

References:

[1] www.example.com "

(Normally you can press the [1] and it will bring you down to the references and show you where it is in the list. If you want to know how to do it, you can do this by pressing the Link button on the upper menu and then depending on whether it is a source from wikipedia or an outside link, select the option, paste the link to the source and sandbox will generate the [1] hyperlink. From there to create the Reference section, press the Insert tab on the upper menu while editing, select More, then choose Reference list and insert your link and it will create a uniform reference list)

Other than that, the article is well written. If the author would want to go further, maybe try inserting a picture to help get the point across, but other than that I think that it is good!