User:Qwerfjkl/sandbox/mirrorPage

Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.

User essays worth reading
(Copied from User:EEng) • Revert notification opt-out

• Identifying reliable sources (history)

• Presentism

• User:Ritchie333/Hit and run editors

• WP:Lies Miss Snodgrass Told You

• WP:Wikipedia is not about whining

• WP:Principle of Some Astonishment

• WP:Diffusing conflict

• Criticism -- re "Criticism", "Controversy" and similar sections

• User:Ritchie333
 * WP:If MOS doesn't need a rule on something, then it needs to not have a rule on that thing (help invited)
 * WP:Iron Law of Infobox Ubiquity
 * WP:Please shoot yourself in the foot (cf. WP:Don't shoot yourself in the foot)
 * Noted not notable – help invited
 * WP:ASSUMEGODFAITH – not (yet) worth reading, actually.
 * WP:BENOTBOLD
 * Queen Elizabeth slipped majestically into the water
 * WP:LOCATION Location, location, location! (plus WP:AREYOUBEINGSERVED)
 * WP:INTOTHEWOULDS Needs to be split out
 * WP:ANIFLU
 * Editors you might confuse WP:Editors who may be confused
 * We are not as dumb as you think we are
 * User:Guy Macon/Yes. We are biased. (towards science and against pseudoscience, towards astronomy, and against astrology...)
 * User:Physchim62/Situation Normal: All FACked up re the dysfunction of the FA process
 * Don't call it "Wiki" – People who do are usually trouble
 * See also:
 * Stigler's law of eponymy
 * Conflict-of-interest editing on Wikipedia
 * Philosophical razor

Quotes
These quotes are random, and will change if you purge the page. (.)

All quotes.

And from IRC/Quotes:

All IRC quotes.

Miscellaneous

 * An encouraging article
 * /disambiguation