User:Qwertygirl123/Culture of Germany/Cw1120 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Qwertygirl123
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Qwertygirl123/sandbox

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Lead evaluation
This section is concise. I think that this section reflects a good summary of the content that is expressed in the original article. I also think that more information might be useful to add if this is the lead section that covers more clearly the sections that are in the rest of the article, like music and language.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

Content evaluation
I think that the content added is up-to-date and relevant to the topic. I think that this addresses a content gap by looking at a different way to look at German culture, through history and population.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Tone and balance evaluation
I think that while this section is interesting to read, some of the tone comes off a little persuasive. I think that this could be revised to be more neutral by looking more at the facts of what the stereotypes are and how Germans differ from those stereotypes. However, I think that this section does well at representing all viewpoints and looks like it is working to weave in more information about those views.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Sources and references evaluation
It appears that this section might need more sources to back up the data it is providing. The citation that is available does work and does seem to be a good starting point for adding to the sources on the article. This source is from 1974, so maybe in looking for more sources, it might be useful to look for sources made recently to fully cover the knowledge available on this subject.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Organization evaluation
The content is well-written, clear, and easy to read. I did not notice any grammatical or spelling errors. I also think that the content is well--organized into paragraphs that make sense.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Images and media evaluation
There are no images on the draft, but there are a few images on the original article that help showcase all of German culture.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

New Article Evaluation
There is an original article for this draft.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?

Overall evaluation
This is a great start to revising the original article. I think that the information could be more complete by adding a few more sources and giving a short summary of the sections of the article. But, I also think that this section is easy to read and gave interesting information about German culture.