User:R. Chu, Future UCSF Pharm.D./sandbox

Orchiectomy - content is brief but covers the topic and straight to the point Yes, the points covered in the article are accompanied by verifiable secondary sources that were cited. These sources were freely available when cross-referenced for accuracy and accessibility.

The group's edits improved the article as described in the Wikipedia peer review "Guiding framework." The introduction now provides a more detailed overview on pessaries and its history of use. The section on the types of pessaries does a comprehensive job on covering the uses and differences of each pessary. The inclusion of the side effects section helped balance the article by not just covering the benefits but also including valid points on side effects and complications. Overall, I found this article easy to read due to the organisation of the sections and also found it to be clear, balanced and neutral. This group was able to accomplish their goals of using reliable sources in order to build a stronger introduction, and cover the types of pessaries and side effects.