User:R. Culverwell/Windust Caves Archaeological District/EmmettForster Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

R. Culverwell


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:R.%20Culverwell/Windust_Caves_Archaeological_District?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Windust Caves Archaeological District

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

As far as I can see, the article has not been edited as of yet, so I'll just review the article as it stands!

This is a tough article to analyze since it is very, very short. The peer review guiding questions don't really apply because there is no "Lead" or "Body;" it's all one, small block. As such, my main suggestion here would be to simply add evidence! A few specific spots you could do this are as follows:

1. The last sentence of the page needs to be expanded upon. What were those stratigraphic layers? What were his findings? How can they be interpreted/add to the overall narrative of the site?

2. What was the archeological evidence found at the site? At the start of the third paragraph, it says, "The earliest finds...." What are those finds? How do they "point to a lifestyle that was semi-nomadic? A lifestyle of who?

3. The article mentions that there were five separate periods of occupation... when were they? How have archeologists determined this? What does this mean for the site's broader context?

Overall, the page as it stands seems to be simply a collection of a few unspecific facts about the site. I suggest that you try to both expand upon these points, add now ones, and overall explain why this site is even important; how the evidence found there tells us something about the past and how that narrative fits into a larger context.