User:R. Dela Cruz, UCSF/Theca lutein cyst/D Do!UCSFpharmstudent2024 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

I am working the Theca lutein cyst wiki article done by R. Dela Cruz, UCSF, Dgarza23, Ltordera24


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Theca lutein cyst
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead = The lead has greatly improved from what it was previously. There is more content and the wording is in layman terms which make it easy for the reader to understand. It is much more concise and clearly describes the topic of the article.

Content = and all the information that is put down belongs to the topic. No it does not deal with Wiki's equity gaps.

Balance and Tone = The content is neutral and it was not bias to one side or the other. The article was inclusive to all women which made the addition of all view points.

Sources and References = The references are backed up by secondary resources which make it more reliable. The sources are current and the content reflects what the article is explaining based on the source. All the links work.

Organization = The content is well written and organized which makes it easier for the reader to follow. There are no grammar or spelling errors in the article. It is well broken down in multiple sections of the main topic.

Images and Media = There are more pictures in the article which helps give a visualization to the readers and are placed in an appropriate place in the article. The pictures are relevant to the topic of the article and are well captioned.