User:R. S. Shaw/z

areas that could use some work
 * art on n-address or n-operand instr formats? - see what's around
 * Martha Carrier
 * Significance arithmetic
 * Flight management system -no art; research needed
 * trap
 * instruction
 * Computer Architecture mentions CPU architecture which redirs to CPU design. Also, Processor Arch redirs to CPU design. Then there's instruction set which talks about the larger ISA. A mess of substandard articles, twisty passages all alike.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86_assembly_language

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memory_Model

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Macro_Assembler

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/32-bit_application

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flat_memory_model

http://webster.cs.ucr.edu/Page_TechDocs/MASMDoc/ProgrammersGuide/Chap_02.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memory_segment

test -R. S. Shaw 03:47, 13 June 2006 (UTC) - 13 June 2006

edits   prose

Inconsistent use of "reviewed" and "quality" (Jan 2009)
On the "Page stabilization" page (Special:Stabilization), the text says "The latest quality revision; if not present, then the latest sighted one" on one line, and on the next line says " The latest reviewed revision". If my understanding is right, reviewed revision and quality revision mean the same thing. Only one of the synonymous terms should be used in order to avoid confusion. -R. S. Shaw (talk) 22:37, 24 January 2009 (UTC)