User:R5shahucsd/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Praxeology

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I thought the topic was interesting and I am deeply interested in philosophy and human behavior. At a cursory glance, the article had some historical information and some opinions which I was interested to see.

Evaluate the article
The lead section was good, but it was perhaps a bit too concise. The content was initially historical which was informative. However, when the article dives into subdivisions of praxeology it fails to really explain with any detail what these subdivisions are. There is also criticisms, but I feel like there isn't enough background and analysis for criticisms. Aside from that, the content is relevant, but doesn't have too much recent information. That may be because it isn't too popular currently, but I can't be sure. The tone is quite neutral. I appreciate that the article talks about both background and criticisms for neutrality. The sources of this article are good, and the organization is good, but there is no images or other media that are really helping my understanding of the article. The talk page had some interesting discussion that talked about the objectivity of the article and helped me address some of my biases when initially reading. I didn't have background on the topic so I had no way of understanding the Austrian bias that could exist in the article. Overall, I would rate the article a 7/10. There could be more in the article and it could have a more comprehensive pro and con list for neutrality, but the sources and overall content are good.