User:R5shahucsd/Peer mentoring/Gaquach Peer Review

General info
R5shahucsd
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * - Cannot find it, evaluating current version
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Peer mentoring

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead:

I cannot find new content added by peer, so the Lead does already reflect the content in the article. The Lead does however contain a strong introductory sentence that covers what peer mentoring is. The lead has a brief description of the article's major sections, and covers it all in a way that is concise. It does not include any information that is not present in the article.

Content:

The content added is all relevant to the topic, though more could be added to cover the peer mentoring strategies and programs that are more recent. It does not seem that there is content that does not belong. This article topic does not directly address topics related to historically underrepresented populations.

Tone and Balance:

The content is relatively neutral, but seems to emphasize the benefits of peer mentoring instead of criticizing it. There are different viewpoints presented, but it seems that there is still only an emphasis on people and organizations that utilize it.

Sources and References:

Everything is properly sourced, though it could benefit for a more diverse range of references, as mentioned in tone and balance.

Organization:The grammar is very clear and the article is well organized into the varying sections.