User:RB88986P/Jargon/Benevolent Bat Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

RB88986P


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:RB88986P/Jargon?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Jargon

Evaluate the drafted changes
I was unable to review what RB88986P has been working on as their sandbox is empty. However, when going to their article they're editing I can see from the history that they had added a source on the page before so I went to the article to see what their addition might be. The source they used was a Journal Article that seems to be reputable. They had also added in a line about jargon and how it is used in practice. This is a strong line and successfully follows the guidelines on what information you can add to an article. It is not copying what was written in the journal as well as adds to the way jargon can be taken the wrong way especially when it is in written form. Overall I think they would benefit from adding to their sandbox page and possibly updating some of the other sources that are in the article.