User:REL9040/Aspergillus niger/Mfavro Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

I am reviewing the work of my classmates with the usernames, Eecc27, Egross123, Nathalieslebreton, and REL9040.


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:REL9040/Aspergillus_niger?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Aspergillus niger

Evaluate the drafted changes
The edits to the article that I was able to find in the sandbox has some pretty good information about the industrial uses of this fungi. This provides interesting information, that is also pertinent in the real world applications of the microbe. The sandbox also has some general information about the organism such as where it is found, and what effects it has on humans and food deterioration. This is a good start, but obviously there is much more information that should be added. The tone does not seem biased in any way, and the information that is currently included appears objective in nature. All of the claims made are followed up with proper citations, which all appear to be peer reviewed and from reputable sources. The "article body" seems a little disjointed and like it covers some information that could be broken into multiple sections. More information about the classification and taxonomy of the organism should be included, which will give some heft to the article. Additionally, including photos or figures would also give some strength to the article. The sources all seem relatively up to date, which is a good sign. Overall, the article looks like it is off to a good start and is progressing nicely. The grammar is good, and the sentences seem complete. With some slight restructuring of the article body into a few more sections, and some content addition this article will be moving forward quite nicely.