User:RJSteed/Abnormal psychology/Will590 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

RJSteed


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:RJSteed/Abnormal psychology


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Abnormal psychology

Evaluate the drafted changes
The content you added is really relevant and had not been mentioned previously. The impression i got was really good, the addition was concise and to the point. The biggest area of improvement would be talking a little more in detail about the lack of studies in older children. With the family systems heading, it might be beneficial to make a sub heading for each of the treatments that way you can focus some more on the details of what each one is. That would also allow you to keep the Family systems topic about the entire branch as a whole without running the risk of divulging onto a tangential topic. I did like your sources and i think you can get some more information from them if you so desired.