User:RJSteed/sandbox

Article Evaluation
I have chosen to evaluate the Dissociative Identity Disorder WikiPage. From what i can see, all of the statements seem to be supported by reliable sources, and most of the links to these sources work well. I did not percieve any distractions in regard to content. The article, as well as the sources seem unbiased. There is also balance between the various sections. Although i did not see any plagiarism, there was information that stated that updates were needed regarding certain statements.

The information that i have learned in this weeks training exercise will help me edit wikiarticles more efficiently. I like the concept of the sandbox because it allows for the organization and creation of works without creating too much activity and alteration on an article at once. I also saw that there is quite a bit of information on wikipedia that is out of date. Although the information is backed by credible sources, the info could be unreliable due to it's age.

Nice work on this evaluation! I would suggest that as you are practicing, you try to use similar practices that will be necessary during article editing on Wikipedia. This includes spell check (perceive above misspelled) and grammar checks (capitalization of "I"). How did you come to the determination that the sources seem unbiased? Did you check any of them? Liz