User:RLW016/Jones Lake State Park/Mph105 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? RLW016
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:RLW016/Jones Lake State Park

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * This peer did update the references within the lead. However, the text is the same just with updated references.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * The introductory sentence of the lead is concise and describes where Jones Lake State Park is located.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * No, it just basically states some facts about the park itself.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No. The information within the lead is related to the topic and it is talked about throughout the history section.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Concise

Lead evaluation
Throughout the lead I saw where you had added the additional updated references. However, you could possibly include some additional information (descriptions) about the lake within this section. These additions can include landscape description/ecology and the importance of the lake itself.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Yes, the editor did update the references throughout the article itself.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * No
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?
 * No

Content evaluation
Throughout the content of this article, the author did add the updated citations and changed the wording of some of the sentences. The new references that the author posted are working properly and when linked carry you to an appropriate source. I would recommend that you could include some additional information about the biodiversity of the lake. Are there any particular fish species that inhabit the waters at Jones Lake? What are the different physical factors of the water?

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Not in particular.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Yes
 * Are the sources current?
 * Yes
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * Yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * Yes the links do work

Sources and references evaluation
Here it is evident that the author spent their time updating the outdated links to other website articles. I have clicked on a few of the links and they do work. My only suggestion is maybe add some more sources within the history section, just to back up the information that is stated.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Yes
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * No
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Yes

Organization evaluation
This particular article is broken up into different sections and include an adequate array of details that cover all the topics.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * The added references and improved ones did overall add to the article. However, additional text can be added to include further details about each section.
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * Sources are now up to date.
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * Adding additional information to some vague areas in the ecology section. Also add some more links that describes the close parks to Jones Lake