User:RM0RFD/Cardiac imaging/Cheerio3 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

I am reviewing RMoRFD's work.


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:RM0RFD/Cardiac_imaging?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Cardiac imaging

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? - Hi! I don't see any new information in your draft for a lead section but I think it could be a good idea to add a sentence on what the indication section is covering, like the importance of this technology.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? - Yes, the content added expands on the idea in the article.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? - the references are mostly from the 2000's
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? - It might be a good idea to add to the indication section in the original article. I think more information that applies to Cardiac imaging in general could be useful and possibly mentioning the most effective and least effective technique here too. It could also be helpful to to explain that there are multiple techniques under echocardiography in the first paragraph in that section before jumping into the individual techniques and their descriptions. I also noticed that some of the content you added can be merged with the original content on the article to limit redundancy. For example, information on positron emitting in the nuclear medicine imaging section can be condensed by incorporating your description with the original articles description(paragraph one in that section).

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? - yes, the new content added is neutral and sticks to stating the facts and uses of the technology.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Not sure what the list of sources at the top are for or if you have yet to cite them and add to references.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? - I think the flow of the echocardiography section would be better if the third paragraph in that section came before the second one allowing for the technology to be introduced with what it is typically used for before providing information on how it works.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

- no pictures added

Overall impressions
Guiding questions: Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? - Your contributions have definitely improved the article and provided in-depth information about each type of cardiac imaging.