User:RM0RFD/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Internet in Bahrain

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
This was a random article chosen from the C-Class article list.

Evaluate the article
Lead Section

The lead section does have an introductory sentence, but it is lacking in clarity. The lead does not include a a description of the major sections. The lead includes information that does not belong in the introduction. It is relatively concise, but as stated before, has extraneous information.

Content

The content is largely relevant to the topic, but the section about arresting bloggers is not explicitly relevant to internet in Bahrain. The information seems relatively up to date considering it's internet statistics, but it could probably use an update. As before, there is content that does not belong. The article could include more internet usage stats. This article does not explicitly deal with an equity gap.

Tone

The article has a largely neutral tone, but there are numerous sentences that appear to be opinion and are not backed up by a source. Since this article is simply about internet, there are no skewed viewpoints.

Sources

Many facts in the article are backed up by sources, but there are so unsourced and opinionated statements. The available sources are relatively current, but many do not work and seem unreliable. As before, many sources do not exist and those that are clickable could be more reliable. The citations definitely need a re-work.

Organization

The article is relatively easy to read, but includes a few grammatical errors. The article is broken down into multiple sections with distinct information, but a few sections have questionable relatability.

Images

This article only includes one image, which is rather small and hard to see. The image does enhance the article and it is captioned well. The image is a self-screenshot, which I believe is allowed under Wiki's copyright policy.

Talk Page

This article has a surprisingly rich talk page, albeit outdated, that discusses updates to the article and questions about links. The article is rated C-Class and is part of WikiProject Bahrain and Internet.

Impressions

The article is well written overall, but is lacking in updates; the article was last updated in June of 2021. It's strengths is its organization and presentation of information, but its weaknesses largely lie in its broken links and lack of citations. The article would be greatly improved with some edits, removal of extraneous information, and implementation of reputable sources and images. I would say this article is underdeveloped.