User:RMEDiver1989/Everett Rogers/Gscott2844 Peer Review

General info
Gscott2844
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Everett_Rogers&oldid=1150651761
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Everett_Rogers&oldid=1150651761

Evaluate the drafted changes
I see that both your "Bibliography" and "Sandbox Draft" are in red ink, so I hope you are able to see this review and submit both of those assignments until the entire project is due. As far as the article itself goes, the orginal author divided the information into three main subject areas, which I agree with, however the distribution of information in each paragraph is where I run into problems with it. I truly believe the introduction paragraph ought to be the shortest paragraph rather than the shortest, whereas this article follows the exact opposite methodology. In addition to the distribution, the original author focuses a lot of his/her attention on the application of Rogers's innovation curve rather than taking the time and page length to fully elaborate and simplify what exactly he discovered and implemented into the business history world. Once this educational subject is fully explained to the reader, then it would be ideal for there to be a follow-up paragraph that sets the theory into an example that can be followed along well enough for the reader to understand. This article has a lot of room for improvement, which I believe will only help you succeed more in this project. You're going to do great!