User:RR5786/Scientific writing/BCMisc Peer Review

General info
RR5786
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:RR5786/Scientific_writing?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Scientific Writing

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The writing style is clear and concise, and the citations make sense. Maybe there could be one or two more citations, such as for the ACS system. It could also be clearer where the new information is going within the article.