User:RR5786/Scientific writing/Jmk12 Peer Review

General info
(RR5786)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:RR5786/Scientific writing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Scientific writing

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead

The lead does a good job of clearly stating the topic of the article. I think once the drafted section is added to the main article you can then add a couple sentences introducing the major sections within the article.

Content

The content is related to the topic. The newly added sources are also fairly recent and useful to the page. There is nothing in the article that doesn't belong.

Tone and Balance

The article and additions to the article are neutral and well balanced. There is no bias indicated in the writing and the sections already within the article seem to share the same amount of content. I think the newly drafted section could have additional information added that could further explain and go into detail of the sources used.

Sources and References

The sources and references are relevant to the topic and used well. The links work and are fairly recent.

Organization

The article is well organized and easy to understand. There is a good flow in each section.

Images and Media

There were no images or forms of media added.