User:RWarren51/sandbox

There are five different types of voting technologies that are currently being used in the United States polling locations. These include hand counted paper ballots, mechanical lever machines, punch cards, optically scanned paper ballots, and electronic voting machines. Each location is charged with learning the technology and implementing the process to vote in each election.

History
Polling places used to gather and count ballots in elections have changed significantly over the past 250 year. Advances in technology have played a major role in changing the polling places because as the type of ballot changed, the venue in which the ballots are counted also changed. One of the main reasons for advancement was to be able to access the results quicker. First was the word ballot, then came the different types of paper ballots, and today we have the electronic balloting systems.

Before there were paper ballots, people would simply call out their selection at the polling place. This polling place was typically the county courthouse or town hall. Sometimes these polls were taken outside of the venue in a more informal fashion. When the voters came to the town hall to announce their choice, he or she would get in line to see the judge and swear in. Once the voter put his or her hand on the Bible and swore to the judge, they would be allowed to cast one ballot per election. The judge acted as the only form of voter identification and it was up to them to be able to identify individuals that had already voted and exclude them from voting again.

The use of paper and electronic ballots have been the most widely used form of capturing votes in recent history. When paper or electronic ballots are used, the polling place must be professionally organized in order to ensure that the ballots are not tampered with and are accounted for accurately. These polls are held inside a building that has been setup in stations to assist voters. When the voter arrives he or she will be asked to show a form of voter identification. Once the voter has been properly identified he or she is escorted to a voting booth where the votes are captured. Once all the votes are captured the voter then verifies his or her voting ticket and then submits the ballot either to the poll worker or on the computerized ballot.

Polling Location Impact
What building a particular polling location is placed in can have a significant effect on the results of the poll. Research shows that polling location has an impact on how a voter may cast his or her ballot. This subtle and sometimes unknown factor can be significant and can sway a close election. Individuals can be influenced to behave in a certain way based on environmental cue. An environmental cue is defined as an object or place that can prompt a part in an individual’s identity and influence the way he or she behaves. Examples of such cues can be things such as the condition of the building, the name of the building, the ordinary use of the building, or the building decor. Researchers have spent a great amount of time attempting to figure out what makes people vote the way they do, and what they have found is that the smallest of changes can have large impacts.

The building being used as the polling place has significant impact on how an individual votes. For example, voting from inside a school building, a citizen might be more likely to vote for those in favor of school systems and education. This is especially true if the school building you are voting in is in need of general improvement and or renovations. This environmental cue has the ability to give a voter firsthand knowledge of what needs may occur in a particular setting. In addition, voting from inside a church, a citizen might be less likely to vote in favor of stem cell research. These cues give a person a sense of satisfaction for voting one way or another in the moment regardless if that was the way they intended to vote in the first place.

The cost of voting plays an important role in whether or not a person will vote. Research shows that the more expensive voting gets, the less likely a person is to vote. Distance to and from the polling location is one of the main reasons cost can become an issue for voters. Minor changes in distance from voter's homes to polling place can increase or decrease the amount of votes, therefore altering the outcome of a close election. The reason distance to the polling place is such an issue is because not every voter has access to vehicle transportation. According to the research on distance to the polling location from Haspel and Knotts, "To illustrate the range of the effect of distance, we plot our predicted probabilities at the lower and upper bounds of our continuous vehicle available variable. When no one owns a car (vehicle available = 0), the likelihood of voting drops from .664 at a distance of .01 miles to .418 at the median distance of .69 miles. When automobiles are universally available (vehicle available = 1), voters are much less sensitive to changes in distance: the likelihood of voting drops from .444 to .392 over the same distance range". Voters ultimately value the convenience of polling locations. If a poll is accessible to the citizen they will make an effort, if the citizen has to travel a long distance then voter turnout decreases dramatically".

If a voter changes precincts due to redistricting then the chances of them continuing to vote in future elections decreases. The confusion that redistricting causes will deter the voter from looking into the new precinct that he or she should now vote in. In addition, the informational costs associated with alerting voters of their new polling location will also affect the voter turnout because it is highly unlikely that funds will be available to allocate to ensure that every voter knows where to vote. Redistricting can be beneficial in order to provide a convenient location but careful consideration should be taken before such a decision is made.

The openness and centralization of the polling location allowing voters to cast their ballot in any number of different locations in the county will increase voter turnout. Sometimes a voter’s most convenient location to vote is near his or her workplace, not necessarily the closest to their residence. Having a more open policy of allowing multiple possible locations for a person to vote would encourage those individuals who cannot feasibly commute back and forth from work to vote. Centralization refers to making the polling location accessible to where citizens work, shop, recreate and travel. Having a large polling location visible to the community will ensure that the voters are aware of where they are supposed vote. This will cut down on necessary signage and will eliminate clutter and confusion.