User:RYNO FIVE/Oil/Naeim9146 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

RYNO_FIVE


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:RYNO FIVE/Oil


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Oil

Lead
You can edit the lead section to reflect the health subsection that you have added. There is already "medical purposes" mentioned there - maybe just add "health and ..." to that. The lead section will then mention your contribution under Applications.

Content
Your content is good. it is useful information in this article. The sentences there are too short. Maybe group a few sentences together. It doesn't matter if your contribution appears smaller but it will make the entire article as a whole look better.

Tone and Balance
Your tone isn't exactly neutral - " A good example is olive oil. " - sounds like it is your opinion that the example of olive oil is a good one. There's no need for this sentence at all and you can continue writing about olive oil. The reader will know that it is a useful example.

"So people would use it to bulk out food so they would have more energy to burn through the day." - Sounds like casual talk.

.Maybe cite more than one resource to support what you have written. Try a citation for each sentence you write. That's kinda what Wikipedia expects.

Sources and References
Your source is good and recent. The second source that points to another Wikipedia page -perhaps get the sources from there.

Better to overdo citations that make it very easy for the reader to find the source.

This one:

Moghadasian, Mohammed H. (2008). "Advances in Dietary Enrichment with N-3 Fatty Acids". Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 48 (5): 402–10. doi:10.1080/10408390701424303. PMID 18464030. S2CID 41311376.

Organization
Fits well within the oils article.

Overall
Good addition to the article. Even small contributions can be very useful to Wikipedia.