User:R Matt Davidson/sandbox

R Matt Davidson 05:43, 7 February 2017 (UTC)First off the article does appear to contradict some of the information provided in Elizabeth I written by David Loades, in regards to the formal education of Elizabeth and what Kat Ashley's role was. When mentioning Elizabeth's education there are no citations to back up the information. One of the refrence links, A Who's Who of Tudor Women, doesn't work. Over all the composition of the article lacks the necessary decisiveness needed to reassure the accuracy of the material being presented.Examples of this include introducing a paragraph with "rumors about" and "evidently". The intentions of Thomas Seymour is another possible contradiction to what is presented in the biography Elizabeth I, but a more in depth exploration would be needed to confirm this. Overall article does appear to be unbiased but the material tends to come across as over-represented or overstated.