User:Ra07847/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title Theophilus Painter
 * Theophilus Painter


 * Article Evaluation
 * The lead portion of the essay is well-written and includes an introduction line and a general description. The article's information appears to be mostly evenly distributed across the text, on subject, but not enough information in each sub missing that go-in depth type of information. The article's tone and harmony don't come off as biased or contradictory in any manner because the subject is more factual and informative than it is opinionated. In comparison to the dates of the article's most recent revision, the sources are rather current and up to date as in at least this year being revised multiple times. The cited resources are non-existent, the article needs them in order to be official. The subjects in this article are logically arranged, and appropriate. The reader may need a better grasp and relate with the topic thanks to the lack of various visuals. The many, diverse sources, media and visuals that relate to the material, as well as the arrangement that would make the information readily available to readers. It was a stub article within the American Zoologist stubs. The talk page has just the original person that revised first and no conversation replies. Overall the article needs some serious work, but there's multiple resources that are out there to fix it.


 * Sources
 * https://embryo.asu.edu/pages/theophilus-shickel-painter-1889-1969
 * http://www.nasonline.org/publications/biographical-memoirs/memoir-pdfs/painter-theophilus-shickel.pdf
 * https://www.encyclopedia.com/science/dictionaries-thesauruses-pictures-and-press-releases/painter-theophilus-shickel

Option 2

 * Article title Screamer
 * Screamer


 * Article Evaluation
 * The lead portion of the essay is not well-written and it includes an introduction of the bird and but lacks a general description of whats to be expected as you read on-wards. The article's information appears to be mostly evenly distributed across the text, on subject, but not enough information in each sub missing that go-in depth type of information. The article's tone and harmony don't come off as biased or contradictory in any manner because the subject is more factual and informative than it is opinionated. In comparison to the dates of the article's most recent revision, the sources are rather current and up to date. The cited resources are accurate, lacking variety, quantity for a subject like this the article needs more of them in order to be official. The subjects in this article are logically arranged, and appropriate. The reader may need a better grasp and relate with the topic thanks to the lack of various visuals. The many, diverse sources, media and visuals that relate to the material, as well as the arrangement that would make the information readily available to readers especially with the vocabulary within the article. It was an article about birds of south america that are exotic with much information about it out on the web. The talk page has just the original person that revised first and no conversation replies. Overall the article needs some serious work, but there's multiple resources that are out there to fix it.


 * Sources
 * https://abcbirds.org/bird/southern-screamer/
 * https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/birds/facts/horned-screamer
 * https://animaldiversity.org/accounts/Anhima_cornuta/

Option 3

 * Article title Chlorpyrifos
 * Chlorpyrifos


 * Article Evaluation
 * The lead portion of the essay is well-written and includes an introduction line and a general description. The article contains all of the information given in the summary, and the lead section is not overly comprehensive. The article's information appears to be mostly evenly distributed across the text, on subject, and given roughly equal weight. The article's tone and harmony don't come off as biased or contradictory in any manner because the subject is more factual and informative than it is opinionated. In compared to the dates of the article's most recent revision, the sources are rather current and up to date. The cited resources are accurate and have a variety of authors and sources. The subjects in this article are logically arranged, and appropriate. The reader may need a better grasp and relate with the topic thanks to the lack of various visuals. The many, diverse sources, media and visuals that relate to the material, as well as the arrangement that would make the information readily available to readers. It was graded C-Class. The article is well-developed and contains a powerful lead section appropriate sourcing, and a sense of balance.


 * Sources
 * http://npic.orst.edu/factsheets/chlorpgen.html
 * https://earthjustice.org/features/chlorpyrifos-what-you-need-to-know
 * https://www.mda.state.mn.us/chlorpyrifos-general-information

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources