User:Ra5en/Cao Yu/Reuentahl404 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username)Ra5en
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Ra5en/Cao Yu

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? yes
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? yes
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? yes
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? It's concise enough to me

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date? yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? no
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? yes

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? no
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? no
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? no

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? yes
 * Are the sources current? yes
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? no
 * Check a few links. Do they work? yes

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? yes
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? no
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? I think it need to add a few sections

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? no
 * Are images well-captioned? see the first question
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? see the first question
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? see the first question

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? yes
 * What are the strengths of the content added? it adds more details which can help readers to understand better
 * How can the content added be improved? I'll write in the overall evaluation

Overall evaluation
Hi, I really like your introduction so far. It is very detailed and to me as you have well-introduced Cao Yu and given a really clear impression of Cao Yu himself. I also think you have done pretty well in such a short paragraph as I think you have already given all the necessary information. However, I do have two suggestions, first of all you may try to add the Chinese version (characters) of Cao Yu's name in this paragraph which would give a much clearer impression for the readers. Secondly, I think maybe this paragraph can be further shortened, as I have though a way like, you can take the part of the influence of western literature to Cao Yu's work out of this paragraph and create a new part to further introduce the influence. Since you've also mentioned Eugene O'Neill's works' influence to his work, I think trying to introduce more about this topic would be fairly interesting but it also need more work as well. Overall, great job!