User:Rabbits65/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title:H.L. v. Matheson
 * Article Evaluation:The article is written clearly and neutrally, but lacks some citations and further details. There is no discussion occurring on the talk page. The article discusses how HL's doctor informed her abortion was necessary, but does not detail why, nor does it provide any detail as to whether her doctor did or did not follow the Utah law of 1974, and how this led to her participation in a lawsuit.
 * Sources:https://www.globalhealthrights.org/h-l-v-matheson/ :https://www.loc.gov/item/usrep450398/ :These two pages provide further details on HL's story and the progression of the lawsuit.

Option 2

 * Article title:Ask for Angela
 * Article Evaluation:The article is written clearly and without visible bias, and seems to have sufficient sources and citations. The talk page briefly references how the article lacks any reference to how Ask for Angela has spread and been adapted beyond the UK and US, which is a clear lack in the article. Additionally, the article only briefly references the movement's namesake, as well as lacking detail about the #NoMore movement that had already begun at the time, and how these two events interacted with each other.
 * Sources:https://askforangela.co.uk/ :Though this is the website created by the organization Ask for Angela, it is still a valid source of information on their history and purpose.

Option 3

 * Article title:Man Made Language
 * Article Evaluation:The article is clear but far too brief. The entire middle section is a run-on sentence which does not provide any detail to Spender's history as a writer or any elaboration into why she makes and how she supports her arguments in the novel. Additionally, the article lacks citations and sources. There is no active talk page.
 * Sources:https://web.archive.org/web/20130511052123/http://www.abc.net.au/queensland/stories/s1443962.htm :https://web.archive.org/web/20130706174206/http://www.abc.net.au/talkingheads/txt/s1344916.htm :https://www.pbs.org/speak/speech/prejudice/women/ :Unfortunately all of these sources are quite old, as Spender has not done much press recently. However, they do provide more insight into Spender's research and theory.

Option 4

 * Article title:Mighty girl effect
 * Article Evaluation:The article is clear and provides evidence where needed, however, it lacks detail in the 'Mighty Boy Effect' section on the research it cites, as well as detail to the numerous studies referenced, but not explored in the main section. There are numerous sources and citations, showing that the information is available, but was underutilized. The talk page brings up this issue as well. To better this article, the author should use the sources they had previously cited, and go more in depth on the studies done on the Mighty Girl Effect.
 * Sources:https://www.brandeis.edu/magazine/2018/winter/inquiry/daughters.html :https://www.understandingsociety.ac.uk/2018/12/17/why-men-with-daughters-are-less-sexist :https://bigthink.com/the-present/being-father-to-daughter-makes-men-less-sexist/ :https://repec.iza.org/dp11259.pdf :These sources and more are current and already listed on the Mighty girl effect page. The author can use the previously accessed sources to improve their article.

Option 5

 * Article title:Beal v. Doe
 * Article Evaluation:The article is clear, however, it lacks sources and citations. The article does not discuss the preceding events nor the progression of the case in detail, and speaks only broadly about the results of the case, without providing much detail. There is no active talk page for this article.
 * Sources:https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/432/438/ :https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/432/438: