User:Rachelannm4/sandbox

The article has lot of references to people that are not actually backed up with data. For instance, in one part the article says “Some argue that the adoption…” but never goes on to state who. Stating who these people are will allow for a more effective argument, and also a more reliable source. Also, some of the data is not directly cited and should be. Readers need to have direct access to where the data is coming from. If a claim is made about how much grain is used in beef production, we need the exact reference so we know the data is reliable. Also, the criticism section is sparse. The rest of the article that argues for a vegetarian diet has plenty of data to support the side, while the side that is critiquing it has absolutely no hard data to support. It would make the source less biased if there were more counterarguments to the subject. Rachelannm4 (talk) 05:54, 1 February 2018 (UTC)